State v. Foster
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Defendant, on this appeal, raises the question of the sufficiency of the bill of indictment on the grounds that it does not sufficiently identify the property alleged to have been stolen. The bill of indictment describes the property as “automobile parts of the value of $300.00 (Three Hundred Dollars) Dollars, of the goods, chattels and moneys of one Furches Motor Company.”
Sections 11 and 12 of Article I of the North Carolina Constitution guarantee that in all criminal prosecutions every person has the right to be informed of accusations against him, and not be put to answer…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. UpchurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. StithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. StithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016