Legal Opinion

United States v. Todd & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1921No. 2047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43723.

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The issue here relates wholly to the classification of white earthenware embossed in the mold, the sole question being whether it is dutiable at 35 per cent ad valorem under the first part of paragraph 79 of the tariff act of 1913 as not ornamented or decorated in any manner, or at 40 per cent under the last part thereof as ornamented or decorated in any manner. The material portions of the paragraph are as follows:

Earthenware and crockery ware composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body; * * * if plain white, * * * not painted, colored, tinted, stained, enameled, gilded, printed, ornamented or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. HealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Colonial Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. International Lapidaries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API