Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Nethercutt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1917No. 13669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered January 19, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

In this action respondent Bradbury, as administrator of the estate of Anis E. Hogan, seeks to quiet title to certain real estate situated in Kittitas county, Washington, by removing two alleged clouds thereon created by a certain deed and mortgage. Erom a judgment granting respondent the relief prayed, appellants Nethercutt and Turn-ham have appealed.

Respondent’s version of the facts, which was adopted by the court as evidenced by its judgment and which is thoroughly substantiated by the record, is, in substance: Anis Hogan employed Nethercutt, an attorney, to represent her in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hadevis v. NuttingWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Opp v. BoggsMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Aberdeen Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Hutchinson Realty Co. v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API