Legal Opinion

Hadevis v. Nutting

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1906No. 6122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered October 27, 1905, upon findings in favor of .the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits in an action for the cancellation of a deed and for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

On the 16th day of April, 1903, L. V. Penny conveyed the property in controversy in this action to the plaintiff Marie Vincente Hadevis by warranty deed, the deed reciting a consideration of $300. At the date of this conveyance Marie Vincente Hadevis was the wife of her copiaintiff Frank Hadevis. On the 9th day of Mayj 1903, the plaintiff Marie Vincente- Hadevis, without her husband joining her, executed a warranty deed of the same premises to L. V. Penny, the grantor in the former deed, for the nominal consideration of $1. L. V. Penny died testate' on the 23d day of January, 1905, and the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bradbury v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API