Legal Opinion
Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & Howell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2017No. 14-56927PublishedCited by 234 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Zakia Mashiri (“Mashiri”) appeals the dismissal of her complaint alleging that the law firm of Epsten Grinnell & Howell and attorney Debora M. Zumwalt (collectively, “Epsten”) committed unlawful debt collection practices in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788 et seq., and the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. Mashiri alleges that Epsten sent her a debt collection letter in May 2013…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Arizona Students' Ass'n v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- James A. Swanson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Tiffany Tabares v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Wallace Jones v. the Best Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Martha McNair v. Maxwell & Morgan PcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Harrington v. Airbnb, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- James Rothery v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.