Wallace Jones v. the Best Service Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Wallace Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo . a district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & Howell, 845 F.3d 984, 988 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Jones’s FCRA claim because Jones failed to allege that the defendant, a debt collector, had requested his credit report…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alessandro-Roberto v. Experian Information Solutions IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
- Hennessey v. Radius Global Solutions LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Joel Guillen v. City of Chula Vista, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- LAWSON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- LAWSON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.