Legal Opinion
James Rothery v. County of Sacramento
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2017No. 09-16852UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
James Rothery and Andrea Hoffman appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of their constitutional rights arising from the denial of a license to carry concealed firearms in public. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Peruta v. County of San Diego, 824 F.3d 919, 925 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (constitutional issues); Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & Howell, 845 F.3d 984, 988 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. WasdenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. WasdenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021