Legal Opinion

Sandor v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, on the grounds that the jury’s verdict in favor of respondent in the amount of $15,171.80 is excessive as a matter of law and is against the weight of the evidence. The issue of damages is factual and thus is essentially a determination for the jury. It is only where it can be said that a verdict is clearly excessive that an interference with it and the trial court’s considered evaluation thereof is warranted. That another trier of the facts might well have arrived at a lower amount is not the test (Colby v. Drew, 15 A D…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Senko v. FondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Wonsch v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Lyons v. De VoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Thompson v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Sydnor v. BondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API