Wonsch v. Snyder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendants-appellants urge five points in their appeal from substantial verdicts in this negligence action. In their first two points they argue that the verdicts as to plaintiff-respondent Benjamin Wonsch, Jr., and plaintiff-respondent Battista are excessive as a matter of law. Both respondents were seriously injured and sustained a variety of permanent injuries. The jury’s determination should not be disturbed unless it is "clearly excessive” (MacArthur v Coxon Real Estate, 28 AD2d 1191; see, also, Riddle v Memorial Hosp., 43…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Riddle v. Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Benedict v. MisenerNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Sandor v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- MacArthur v. Coxon Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kelly v. TarnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Collins v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Noga v. Monroe Medi-TransAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Rivera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Cramer v. Toledo Scale Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.