Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Shalala

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 1996No. Civil A. 96-399 RMUPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

URBINA District Judge.

Denying Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

This matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunc tion; defendants’ opposition; defendanf/in-tervenor’s opposition and plaintiffs reply. 1 The court concludes that plaintiffs motion shall be denied because plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; that it will be irreparably harmed; that the balance of harms favors the issuance of an injunction; or that the public interest will be furthered if the court were to grant…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  2. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Coalition for Common Sense in Government Procurement v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Cardinal Health, Inc. v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Islamic American Relief Agency v. Unidentified FBI AgentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API