City of Anchorage v. Brady's Floor Covering
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered in the Municipal Magistrate’s Court for the City of Anchorage for operating a business without a City business license, in violation of Section 102.1, Chapter 8, General Code of the City of Anchorage, Alaska.
The proceeding was submitted to the Court on the record, the applicable law of the Territory of Alaska and the ordinances of the City of Anchorage.
Section 102.1 provides:
“No person shall engage or be engaged in the operation, conduct or carrying on of any trade, profession, business or privilege without…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Condon v. Village of Forest ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. SturgeonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Fenwick v. City of Klamath FallsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Kodiak v. ValtmanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1957