Legal Opinion

Fenwick v. City of Klamath Falls

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The plaintiff is engaged in the motor carrier business in Klamath Falls, Oregon, operating as an “anywhere for hire carrier”: Oregon Code 1930, § 55-1307, class 2. That is, in transporting passengers from points within to points without, from points without to points within, and from point to point within the city of Klamath Falls. He has complied with all the general laws and the rules and regulations of the Public Service Commission of the state of Oregon. The defendant, through its duly constituted officers, has passed an ordinance known as number 2044 for the regulation of this class of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cummins v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dent v. Oregon CityOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Portland v. TraynorOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Slovanian Literary & Social Ass'n v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union $ Service v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City of Anchorage v. Brady's Floor CoveringDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API