Legal Opinion
Ober v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1930No. 27,706PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial.
The action is for the recovery of possession in the city of Minneapolis of that part of a tunnel under an alley abutting the rear of plaintiff’s 33.15-foot lot, the tunnel having been constructed and used up to December 1, 1928, by the defendant brewing company for transporting cases of bottles by a gravity conveyor from its bottling building, located on one side of plaintiff’s lot, to its warehouse on the other side thereof. The city is made a party defendant. The brewing company’s buildings are large structures of several stories, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Townsend, Grace & Co. v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Bradley v. . Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Yale University v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quigley v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988