Legal Opinion
Castor v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1988No. C3-87-1036Published
1Opinion of the Court
429 N.W.2d 244 (1988)
John E. CASTOR, et al., Petitioners, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondents.
No. C3-87-1036.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 23, 1988.
Bradley J. Gunn, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Robert J. Alfton, City Atty., Allen B. Hyatt, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondents.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
POPOVICH, Justice.
Petitioners John E. Castor, et al., (petitioners) sought an alternative writ of mandamus to compel condemnation proceedings by the City of Minneapolis (city), arising from the city's construction of an enclosed pedestrian…
Also in this document: Dissent · Wahl; Dissent · Wahl.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Minneapolis Gas Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.