Legal Opinion
Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 26, 1950No. 34,824PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for a restraining order or temporary injunction and sustained separate demurrers to the complaint. Plaintiff appeals. Defendants interposed the demurrers on the ground that the facts alleged in the complaint were insufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint sets out the following facts: That plaintiff is the owner and operator of a retail jewelry and optical business at 410 Nicollet avenue in Minneapolis; that under the terms of the lease to the premises he had a right to hang and display an advertising sign over the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Perlmutter v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- City of Miami Beach v. SchauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Quigley v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.