Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Village of Hibbing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1964No. 39,298PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court entered after plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied following a verdict for the defendant in an action for damages sustained when water supplied by the village of Hibbing escaped from a pipe located in one of its streets.

The village of Hibbing, a municipal corporation, furnishes water to the public for a price and, in doing so, uses a system of water mains and collateral lines located in its public streets and alleys. On March 2, 1962, a break occurred in the “service line” extending at right angles from a main to and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hollywood Shop, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Freitag v. City of MontelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API