Hines v. Copeland
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real property.
The complaint alleges that, at the date of the execution of the alleged agreement, the defendant was the owner of one hundred and twenty acres of land situated in Fresno County, and described as “lots 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 of De Witt Colony, according to the map or plat of said colony on file and of record in the office of the county recorder of the county of Fresno, state of California’ ’; that the defendant, on the twentieth day of April, 1911, agreed to sell and convey to the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Preble v. AbrahamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Forbes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Burge v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.