Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Sandy
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 17, 1997No. 2753PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, Judge:
In this lawsuit, arising from an alleged defective design of a residence, the Hursts appeal the grant of summary judgment to Floyd E. Sandy, Respondent. 1 We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
Facts
Viewed in the light most favorable to the Hursts, the evidence is as follows. In April or May 1989, Mr. Hurst discussed with William Sandy, a draftsman and Vice-President of SCC, the design and building of a residence in Sumter. After Mr. Hurst described the house he wanted built, William told him he could draw the design plans. The Hursts hired William and orally agreed to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- ML-Lee Acquisition Fund, L.P. v. DeloitteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Ardis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Whitlaw v. the Kroger Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. StewartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Thomas Learning Center, Inc. v. McGuirkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. KunzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.