Legal Opinion

Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 2013No. F065494PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Nicholas Honchariw filed a vesting tentative map application with the County of Stanislaus that proposed subdividing a 33.7-acre parcel into large residential lots. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus (Board) disapproved the application. Honchariw sued the Board and won on the ground that it disapproved his “proposed housing development project” without making the written findings required by Government Code section 65589.5, subdivision (j). (Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1066, 1070 [132 Cal.Rptr.3d 874].) Our…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rando v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Merced Irrigation District v. Superior Court of Merced CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 6354 Figarden General PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Honchariw v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hart High-Voltage Apparatus Repair & Testing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API