Legal Opinion
Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2010No. 2008-1837 and 2009-0314PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 1} In July 2007, Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (“Duke”) filed an application with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“commission” or “PUCO”) to increase its gas-distribution rates. See case No. 07-589-GA-AIR. Likewise, in August 2007, the East Ohio Gas Company, d.b.a. Dominion East Ohio (“Dominion”), filed an application to increase gas-distribution rates for its service area. See case No. 07-829-GA-AIR.
{¶ 2} Several parties, including Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (“OCC”) and Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy (“OPAE”), intervened in both rate cases. In each…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- At&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re Application Seeking Approval of Ohio Power Company's Proposal to Enter Into an Affiliate Power Purchase Agreement for Inclusion in the Power Purchase Agreement RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.