Legal Opinion

State v. Palmersten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1941No. 32,776PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Convicted of willful neglect of official duty as a police officer in Minneapolis (2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9970) and sentenced to a workhouse term, defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The record fully justified the jury in finding the following facts: Over a period of more than 20 years defendant was a member of the police department of Minneapolis, at least four years of which had been spent as a member of the “purity squad.” During the time here involved he ivas in charge of the “morals squad.” In that capacity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Waddingham v. HulettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. State v. BrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. State ex rel. O'Brien v. TerrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. State v. RiebeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State v. KahnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. GrunewaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API