State v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by tbe grand jury of Hennepin county, charged with the crime of keeping a house of ill-fame, tried in the district court for that county before Hale, J., and a jury, and found guilty as charged in the indictment. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered on the verdict, sentencing him to three years at hard labor in the state prison, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the crime of keeping a house of ill-fame and assignation. He urges as grounds for a new trial: (1) That improper evidence was received over his objec-
tion; (3) that he is not shown to have had knowledge of the evil practices indulged in on his premises; (3) that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, and (4) that it was error to send the jury to view the premises without permitting him to accompany them.
Defendant was the proprietor of the Eevere Hotel in the city of Minneapolis. . The office of the hotel, a café and a saloon…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Sabes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. GardenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.