Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1986No. CX-85-719PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant, James A. Ford, appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the charges, from a judgment of conviction entered on April 10, 1985, and from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to two of twelve charged counts.
Appellant makes two claims. Appellant first claims that the acts alleged in the complaint do not come within the scope of Minn.Stat. § 609.43(2) (1984). Appellant further claims that if the acts do come under § 609.43(2), he should be allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty and stand trial because the State reneged on the plea…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. MontpetitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1988