Legal Opinion

McCreless v. Tennessee Valley Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 6 Div. 711PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was by a depositor against a bank and resulted in a judgment for defendant. A jury was not demanded by either party.

The question of a due demand for payment by a depositor of money in a bank subject to his check was recently discussed in Ex parte First National Bank (First National Bank v. Williams) 206 Ala. 394, 90 South. 340. The complaint, averring “formal demand” of defendant by plaintiff for payment and refusal by defendant and that tie amount was due and unpaid, not being demurred to, stated a substantial cause of action and was sufficient to support a judgment. Hall v. First…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Williams v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Wallace v. Board of Revenue of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Russell v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Ex parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. First Nat. Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Lone Star Cement Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Polytinsky v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Minnifield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API