Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1928No. 2 Div. 923PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The petitioner, A. W. Smith, seeks by the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent bank, as the county depository of Greene county, to payv to him the amount of a certain warrant issued to him by the probate judge on October 11,1927, for work done by him on the public roads of the county, and drawn upon county funds accruing under the Act of August 22,1923 (Acts 1923, pp. 197, 198) and known as the “gasoline fund.”

The respondent depository bank declined to pay this warrant on the ground that the only fund out of which it was legally payable, viz. the “gasoline fund,” had been already set…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  3. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Shenandoah Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Heck v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Dixon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Gray v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API