Legal Opinion

Russell v. Bush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 10, 1916PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Norvelle R. Leigh, Special Judge. Assumpsit by Albert P. Bush against Julia F. Russell to recover broker’s commissions on the sale of real estate. • Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

On the former appeal the law of this case was stated (Bush v. Russell, 180 Ala. 590, 61 South. 373), and defendant’s pleas 5 and A were held insufficient.(1) At the last trial the same matter of defense was stated as follows: “A. The plaintiff’s said cause of action as sued upon in the complaint is based upon the written contract entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendant which was fully described in the third count' of the plaintiff’s complaint and to *311which reference is now made, and a part of the consideration for the promise which was sued upon was a promise on the part of…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Garrison v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Juzan v. ToulminSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Southern Electric Generating Company v. LanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API