Legal Opinion
Ballard v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 7, 1922No. 22,679PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it .failed to state a cause of action. As alleged, these were the material facts: On November 15, 1918, Joseph Friedman and Ms wife entered into a written contract with the plaintiff and one Granstrom for the sale to them of the Park Theatre in the city of St. Paul. By the terms of the contract, the vendors agreed to sell and the vendees agreed to buy the property for $65,000, $10,000 to be paid as earnest money when the contract was executed, $30,-000 on or before 11 a. m. on March 1, 1919, and $25,000 by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Womack v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Joslyn v. SchwendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Needles v. KeysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Nostdal v. MorehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State Bank of Milan v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Tarpy v. NowickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.