Womack v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $15,000 and interest from defendants, H. H. Coleman and C. E. Eindberg, maker and indorser respectively of a promissory note deposited in escrow for the use of plaintiff under the agreement set forth in the opinion. The case was tried before Harrison, J., who granted defendants' motion to dismiss, upon conclusion of plaintiff's testimony. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Upon a former appeal of this action (89 Minn. 17, 93 N. W. 663) the contract now under consideration was before the court upon certain questions with respect to the abstract of title, the time it was to be examined and delivered, the validity of the title tendered, and the nature of-the stipulation for indemnity. The cause, having been remanded, was again tried; and at the close of plaintiff’s case, on motion of defendants, the action was dismissed, and, judgment having been entered to that effect, plaintiff appeals.
*329The following questions are presented:
Is the contract referred to one of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Black v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Joslyn v. SchwendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Womack v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pike Rapids Power Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Windey v. North Star Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Corbett v. CronkhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Durfee House Furnishing Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Gautier v. LapofSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.