Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
This is an action for specific performance or, in the alternative, damages arising out of an agreement relating to the sale of the downtown Dayton’s department store building in Rochester. The district court, upon the motion of defendants, granted summary judgment against plaintiff, and he takes this appeal from the judgment. We affirm.
The agreement upon which this action rests is embodied in a number of documents relating to the Dayton property, including a warranty deed, an assignment of lease, and a bill of sale. All of these documents were deposited August 21, 1973, with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bratt v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pigeon v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. WillcoxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Sports & Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Chicago Cutlery Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Johnson v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.