Legal Opinion

Cabrera v. Collazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Tom, J.E

The remarkable defense proffered in this professional malpractice action is that an attorney who neglects a matter so that the statute of limitations runs against his client cannot be held legally accountable if the attorney happens to expire before the applicable limitations period. A cause of action for attorney malpractice requires: “ ‘(1) the negligence of the attorney; (2) that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and (3) proof of actual damages’ ” (Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 715…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API