Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of Taxation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1974No. 47,050PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This litigation stems from a requirement by the Director of Taxation that appellant, pursuant to provisions of the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (K. S. A. and K. S. A. 1973 Supp. 79-3271, et seq.) employ the “separate accounting” method rather than allocating and apportioning its multistate net income under the so-called “three-factor” formula method (K. S. A. 79-3279 to 79-3287, incl.) for the taxable years 1968 and 1969. The “separate accounting” method is sometimes referred to as the “direct” or “segregated” method of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Donald M. Drake Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Tillotson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. In re ZivanovicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Lakeview Gardens, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. SchneiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API