Legal Opinion

Beatle v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Union District Court. — Hon. Ti-ios. L. Maxwell, Judge. The district court approved of the finding that the statement of consent to the sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Crestón was sufficient. The plaintiff, who objected' to such statement, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

A statement of consent to the sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Creston was filed with the county auditor in February, 1911, and canvassed by the board of supervisors of Union county, March 20th and 21st following. An objection that the supervisors were not in regular session was interposed, but overruled, and the statement found sufficient. On appeal the district court approved this ruling.

*577i. Intoxicating liquors: canvass of consent: when to be made. I. Section 2448 of the Code requires such canvass to be made at a regular session of the board of supervisors, and this would be at a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Tod v. CrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Butterfield v. TreichlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Mann v. City of LeMarsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. People Ex Rel. Simonson v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Gallagher v. School TownshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Puryear v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mason City v. AelingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API