Legal Opinion

Ramish v. Astor

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1935No. Civ. 8860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Appellant Ramish loaned $6,150 to Astor, one of the defendants, at which time Astor executed a promissory note for that amount and caused to be executed a bond by Eureka Casualty Company, a corporation, the other defendant and respondent on this appeal. The bond was conditioned upon the repayment of the money by Astor, and in effect provided that if Astor did not pay, respondent would. Astor did not pay, whereupon appellant filed his complaint alleging two causes of action: the first on the note against Astor, and the second on the bond against respondent.

Thereafter the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Seaboard Surety Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hunstock v. Royal Securities Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Impac Imported Parts & Accessories Corp. v. RattrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API