Legal Opinion

Belisle v. City of Senath

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1998No. 21738PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Winston W. BeLisle (“BeLisle”), d/b/a The Washboard Laundrymat, appeals from a judgment stemming from the refusal of the City of Senath (the “City”) to provide BeLi-sle’s business with an “oversize” water connection for the same fee as a regular water connection. The trial court, without explanation, entered judgment in favor of the City. We do not reach the reach the merits of the case, but instead grant the City’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

BeLisle, though represented by counsel at trial, appeals pro se. Pro se parties are bound by the same rules of procedure as parties represented by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Brancato v. Wholesale Tool Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Jones v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. HeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kline v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Murphy v. ShurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Carden v. City of RollaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Manning v. FedotinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Kittle v. KittleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API