Legal Opinion
Carden v. City of Rolla
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 2009No. SD 29534PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Richard A. Carden (“Appellant”) appeals, pro se, from the “Judgment” of the trial court which dismissed his petition for malicious prosecution filed against The City of Rolla, Missouri, and The City of Rolla Police Department (“Respondents”). Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal asserting that Appellant’s brief violates the provisions of Rule 84.04. 1 Respondents’ motion was taken with the case. As explained below, Respondents’ motion has merit.
At the outset we note Appellant appears before this Court pro se. “Nevertheless, he is bound by the same rules of procedure as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anderson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kline v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Angle v. GrantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- WILLARD SCHNURBUSCH and CAROL SCHNURBUSCH, husband and wife v. WEST PLAINS REGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER, a Missouri not for profit corporation, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Respondent v. WILLARD SCHNURBUSCH, CAROL SCHNURBUSCH, and SCHNURBUSCH LAND SERVICES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Reliable Roofing, LLC v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Yates v. Briggs & StrattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carden v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- RICHARD A. CARDEN and ROSALIE P. CARDEN v. CSM FORECLOSURE TRUSTEE CORPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.