Murphy v. Shur
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
On July 15, 1996, Michael Murphy (“Appellant”), filed a pro se “Complaint for Libel” in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, alleging that two reporters, Jim Shur and Debby Woodin, and their employer The Joplin Globe (collectively “Respondents”) caused to be printed articles about him that were “libelous per se and defamatory per se.” 1 Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. In its judgment filed March 29, 1999, the trial court entered “its Summary Judgment in favor of [Respondents]” and denied “[a]ll other pending Motions.”
On appeal, Appellant claims six points of trial court error…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wipfler v. BaslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Myrick v. Eastern Broadcasting, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cade v. State, Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chipperfield v. Missouri Air Conservation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hardin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Marriage of GerhardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Carden v. City of RollaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.