Legal Opinion
Manning v. Fedotin
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 2002No. WD 59356PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Appellants Leon and Gundrun Manning (hereinafter “the Mannings”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside the dismissal of a medical malpractice action filed against respondents Michael S. Fedotin, B. William Ginsburg, Inc., B. William Ginsberg, Research Medical Center, Health Midwest, Menorah Medical Center, Kansas City Vascular & General Surgeons, and Thomas P. O’Farrell. For the reasons discussed below, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court and affirm the decision not to set aside the judgment of dismissal.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Beckmann v. Miceli Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Cook v. PolineniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kline v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bittick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- In the Interest of T.C.T.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Spears ex rel. Clendening v. Freeman Health SystemsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- City of Richmond v. SuddarthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Epstein v. Villa Dorado Condominium Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.