Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Harmon
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1960No. Civ. 24322PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.
Appeal by defendant from orders made in a proceeding under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1650-1690.)
On May 17; 1956, the superior court made an order directing defendant to pay specified amounts of money for the support of his minor child through the office of the probation officer of Los Angeles County, and that the probation officer hold all money so paid pending a decision on appeal. The order was affirmed by this court on May 2, 1958. (Harmon v. Harmon, 160 Cal.App.2d 47 [324 F.2d 901].) A petition for hearing by the Supreme Court was denied, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Harmon v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Harmon v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978