Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Wells
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. The mother of appellee purchased from appellant (hereinafter called the carrier) a ticket for the transportation of appellee (hereinafter called the passenger) and his baggage from Washington, D. G, to Concord, Massachusetts. When the carrier’s bus arrived in Boston, Massachusetts, the passenger was informed that the carrier had no facilities for transporting him to Concord, and the passenger was compelled to make his own arrangements for transportation to Concord. After arriving at Concord he received a letter from the carrier…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Thomas v. National Delivery Ass'n, IncDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- Mickey Finn Clothes, Inc. v. Yale Transport Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1940
- American Tobacco Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cray v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kellett v. Alaga Coach Lines, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Birmingham Terminal Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Gray v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., Circuit Court of the 14th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Bay County1964
- Zavodnik v. Greyhound Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960