Legal Opinion

Birmingham Terminal Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1947No. 6 Div. 555PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question on this appeal relates to the correct amount for which judgment should be rendered.

Appellant is complaining that the amount of the judgment exceeds its liability. Appellant was the defendant, and will be here referred to as such; and appellee as plaintiff. The trial was on an agreed statement of facts.

Defendant was agent for several railroads entering Birmingham, and furnished the terminal facilities for them, including the “red cap” service, and including the Alabama Great Southern Railway, as one of such railroads. The railroad is not sued, but only the terminal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Nothnagle v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Kellett v. Alaga Coach Lines, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Nothnagle v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API