Zavodnik v. Greyhound Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
Plaintiff sued Greyhound for the value of a suitcase and contents. The complaint was in three parts; the first charged conversion of the property, the second charged gross negligence resulting in its loss or destruction, and the third'charged that the loss resulted from the fraud and deceit of defendant in falsely representing that the suitcase would be placed aboard the same bus on which plaintiff was to travel. Defendant filed an answer denying negligence or fraud. This was followed by pretrial proceedings and then by defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray Tool Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Levenson v. B. & M. FURNITURE CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Stacy Evers v. Herbert A. Buxbaum, T/a Rubin Optical Company, and Dr. Joseph FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. KrejciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Neece v. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.