Legal Opinion
State v. Whiteman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 16, 1987No. 13024PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This appeal requires us to determine the interrelationship between General Statutes § 53a-69,1 which sets forth time limitations for the reporting of sexual assault claims, and General Statutes § 54-193 (b),2 the generally applicable criminal statute of limitations. The defendant, Brian D. Whiteman, was charged by information with sexual assault in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70.3 The defendant moved to dismiss the information, claiming that his prosecution was barred by § 54-193 (b). The trial court rendered judgment granting the motion to *100dismiss with prejudice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- United States v. Paul LevineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.