Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Levine
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 24, 1981No. 80-2648PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The primary question before us is whether a pretrial order of a district court denying a motion to dismiss an indictment on statute of limitations grounds provides a proper basis for an interlocutory appeal. Because we conclude that the pretrial order here is not a final decision for purposes of § 1291, we dismiss the appeal.
I
In March 1980 the government brought a nine-count indictment against appellant Paul Levine, alleging misapplication of funds from the Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 660. 1 Levine moved to dismiss…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick"Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- United States v. Raymond M. MidgleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lance Henry Wilson, United States of America v. Leonard E. Briscoe, Sr., United States of America v. Maurice David SteierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.