Sunset Square Ltd. v. Miami County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals present two issues: first, the proper valuation of the property and second, the propriety of the BTA’s refusal to accept additional testimony in this matter upon remand.
In Alliance Towers, supra, we stated that:
'“[T]hese appeals present us with the opportunity to clarify the test to be used to determine the true value of federally subsidized housing under R.C. 5713.03. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the decision of the BTA in each case is unreasonable and unlawful.” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 20-21, 523 N.E. 2d at 830.
“True value” was described in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wynwood Apartments, Inc. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Canton Towers, Ltd. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Oberlin Manor, Ltd. v. Lorain County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Cincinnati v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Lake Medina Conservation Society, Inc./Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties WCID No. 1 v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- lamcos/bma v. Texas Nat. Res. Conservation Com'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- USAir, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.