USAir, Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
I
Soft Drinks
USAir argues that passengers drank soft drinks to avoid dehydration during the flight and that its provision of such drinks was essential to rendering its transportation service. Thus, it argues, it used or consumed soft drinks directly in the rendition of a public utility service. The commissioner replies that USAir did not establish the necessity of the soft drinks in rendering the transportation service.
R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) excepts from the sales tax (and R.C. 5741.02[C][2] from the use tax) sales “in which the purpose of consumer * * * is to use or consume the thing transferred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Buckeye International, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Abex Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- CNG Development Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- USAir, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997