Legal Opinion

Canton Towers, Ltd. v. Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1983No. 82-439PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to determine the taxable value of the subject property, the BTA must first determine the “true value in money,” as mandated by Section 2, Article XII of the Ohio Constitution and as codified in R.C. Title *657. Wynwood Apartments, Inc. v. Bd. of Revision (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 34, 35 [13 O.O.3d 19]. Appellant contends that the BTA erred in determining the true value of the subject property. The true or fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question of fact, the determination of which is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities, and this court will not disturb…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wynwood Apartments, Inc. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kankakee County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API