City of Cincinnati v. Budget Commission

Appellant, the city of Cincinnati, argues that the BTA should have held another hearing before it reversed its initial finding regarding the inclusion of capital improvement and debt charge items in the budget of the county. It maintains that both the BTA and this court determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the deduction of such items. The county argues that the BTA has no mandatory duty to conduct another hearing and that its decision should stand. We agree with the county and affirm the decision of the BTA.

In our earlier decision, we regarded the BTA’s findings…