Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Reynolds

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 25, 1993No. ACMR 9102327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WALCZAK, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Frankfurt, Germany. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of violating a general regulation by wrongfully carrying a concealed weapon, a lock-blade knife, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 892. The court-martial sentenced the appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, and the convening authority approved the sentence.

I

Speedy Trial

Appellant first argues that he was denied his right to a speedy trial under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WansleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. LanierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. WagnerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. ReynoldsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. RuffinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API