Legal Opinion
New York v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 1, 2002No. CIV. A. 98-1233 CKKPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
“There is a remedy for all things but death . 1
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
INTRODUCTION
Presently pending before the Court are two dueling remedy proposals seeking to redress the wrongs inflicted upon competition by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. These proposals were presented to this Court following the district court’s determination of liability for violation of the Sherman Act, a partial affirmance by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and an order of remand by the appellate court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Freeland v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Comes v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.