Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge.
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, eleven manufacturing concerns 1 producing the great majority of the portable air compressors sold annually in the United States,2 are before us for review of regulations promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) purportedly pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1972.3 The regulations at issue prescribe noise emission standards and establish testing and enforcement procedures for new portable compressors introduced into interstate…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979